
“When it comes to blockages and obstacles in the research process, we must distinguish between difficulties or obstacles that may arise in the course of the investigation for argumentative reasons and obstacles of a personal nature. The former are actually the easiest to solve because they are natural and inherent to the epistemology of scientific research: scientific research progresses through successive adaptations. In very rare cases, a research project ends with the achievement of all its objectives, and precisely those objectives that were set at the planning stage. And that’s a good thing, because it means that the researchers did not proceed blindly, but took into account the evidence they encountered along the way.
However, since problems can arise at any time, it is always a good idea for a research project to have both short-term and long-term goals: to analyze a problem, a difficulty, to break it down into parts, segments, steps to be tackled one by one. This is the right strategy to overcome blockages and obstacles of any kind and not to be paralyzed by the enormity of the problems.
On the other hand, difficulties of a personal nature are not to be underestimated and are becoming more and more frequent. Blockages or paralysis, even for long periods, can be due to insecurity, fear, feelings of inadequacy resulting from the constant confrontation and extreme competition in which research is carried out today. There is a level of ambition that is often excessive and disproportionate to the actual knowledge of researchers who, until proven otherwise, are at the beginning of their careers. On the other hand, there is an urge to compete, a true and proper agonism that is taken to the extreme in academic environments where evaluation is based on mere arithmetic calculations of the number of publications, the number of conference papers, and other criteria that are not qualitative but purely quantitative.
The motto “publish or perish” is a phrase of despair. Our watchwords should be: humility instead of ambition, gradualism instead of precociousness, slowness instead of haste, rigor instead of the frenetic rhythm imposed by the desire to meet the next deadline.
It is not surprising that, in predisposed individuals, the mixture of ambition and agonism can be fatal, leading to real psychological disorders such as anxiety, panic attacks and, in the most severe cases, paranoid forms such as the impostor syndrome, typical of those convinced that they are not up to their role, or the false victimization syndrome, typical of those convinced that they are being persecuted by their colleagues or supervisors and who see in every gesture a sign of persecution against which they believe they must defend themselves. It is therefore not uncommon for even the correction of a thesis by a supervisor or the rejection of an abstract for a conference to be experienced as moments of discrimination, mobbing, persecution, or worse.
The biggest problem is that even the most titled academics who may end up in a position of responsibility often have no expertise in these matters and no tools to decipher these behaviors, so they often react with blatant incompetence.”
Francesco Finocchiaro – Cristina Pascu, Musical Research: Trends, Methods, and Contemporary Challenges, 19 November 2024, National Academy of Music “Gheorghe Dima”, Cluj-Napoca





You must be logged in to post a comment.